Contact

​

nbekkouche@nbeeducation.com

1-438-879-0187

NBE Education

Inspiration through learning

When You Want To Throw Your Hands Up In The Air…

October 11, 2017

Stressing Out After The Exam

October 7, 2017

Bottom-up and Top-down Learning

October 5, 2017

Communicating Science

September 1, 2016

Understanding Science

August 11, 2016

Understanding Change

July 20, 2016

Learning to Trust Yourself

May 19, 2016

“A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds.”

October 23, 2012

Please reload

Recent Posts

When I work with students as a tutor, I see that one of the things that people struggle with the most is learning to trust themselves.

The educational...

Learning to Trust Yourself

May 19, 2016

1/1
Please reload

Featured Posts

Understanding Science

August 11, 2016

|

Nadine S Bekkouche

Sometimes I feel there is nothing more misunderstood in education today than science.

 

And I don’t mean that too few kids are learning about atoms and electrons. More people are learning about science today than ever before. But even among science’s proponents, the purpose of science is shockingly often misunderstood.

“Do you even science, bro?”

 

Who hasn’t seen this Internet meme? But, to answer the question it poses: no. Most people do not understand science, let alone do it. And just because you have taken an undergrad chemistry class doesn’t mean you understand it either.


Let’s do a pop quiz. Which of the following statements are most correct:
A.    The purpose of science is to use verifiable data to make conclusions about questions that we are sure are right.
B.    The purpose of science is to use verifiable data to draw conclusions about questions that are less wrong than our previous ones.


If you answered A, you got the wrong answer.

 

Science is not about being more right, it is about being less wrong.


The scientific method is taught in high school, but often by people who only understand it very approximately themselves.


Science is about building models of reality that come closer and closer and closer to estimating it accurately.
It’s about evaluating data, rejecting bad or faulty data, and systematically comparing observations with ideas (hypotheses) about the world.


It’s about throwing out the hypotheses that do not hold given valid observations, and accepting (retaining) hypotheses that do hold.


It’s about synthesizing the conclusions of hundreds, or thousands, of studies, to make a very informed, as-nearly-right-as-we’re-gonna-get-right-now, statement about reality.


And it is deeply and profoundly helpful for solving human problems.

Some fields of science are applied, others are not

 

To be fair, the applied sciences are more about "getting it right". After all, I don't want an engineer to build a bridge based on a theory that she isn't 100% confident in. I want her to be totally confident that she is right, her model is right, and I will be alright.

 

Some phenomena are more amenable to scientific inquiry. Something concrete and observable can yield much stronger statements than something abstract and difficulty observable.

 

But a scientific approach can be adopted for both, and the basic philosophy of science requires the ability to change one's mind according to the evidence.

 

This is remarkably difficult to do and to understand... but what a thrill it is to experience.

 

Tags:

science

teaching

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Please reload

Follow Us

bottom-up learning

burnout

change

corrective feedback

education

feedback

grad school

learning

science

self-care

self-correcting

study habits

teaching

top-down learning

trust

tutoring

university

writing

Please reload

Search By Tags

October 2017 (3)

September 2016 (1)

August 2016 (1)

July 2016 (1)

May 2016 (1)

October 2012 (1)

Please reload

Archive
  • Facebook Basic Square
  • Twitter Basic Square
  • Google+ Basic Square
  • Home

  • For students

  • For business

  • Online School

  • Publishing

  • Blog

  • More