CSSHE 2021: 21st Century Supervision
AUCC, (The Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada). (2011). Trends in Higher Ed, Volume 1 – enrollment.
Bitzer, E. (2010). Postgraduate research supervision: more at stake than research training. Acta Academica, Supplement 1, 23 – 56. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC15106
Brown, L. (2007). A consideration of the challenges involved insupervising international masters students. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 31(3), 239-248. DOI: 10.1080/03098770701424967
Brown, L., & Holloway, I. (2008). The initial stage of the international sojourn: excitement or culture shock? British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 36(1), 33-49. DOI:10.1080/03069880701715689
CAGS, (Canadian Association for Graduate Studies). (2012). Creating a Letter of Understanding for Advisors/Supervisors and Graduate Students. Ottawa, ON: CAGS.
Cassuto, L. (2015). The graduate school mess: What caused it and how we can fix it. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
Cherry, N. (2012). The paradox and fog of supervision. Quality Assurance in Education, 20(1), 6-19. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684881211198202
George Brown College. (2004). Academic Policies, Guidelines and Codes of Conduct. Retrieved from
Grant, B. M. (2005). The pedagogy of graduate student supervision: figuring the relations between supervisor and student. PhD Thesis, University of Auckland, Aotearoa, New Zealand. Retrieved from https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/handle/2292/295.
Gilbert, T. (1996). The behavior engineering model. In Gilbert, T. (1996). Human competence: Engineering worthy performance. Silver Spring, MD: International Society for Performance Improvement. Pp. 73-107
Golde, C. M. (2005). The role of the department and discipline in doctoral student attrition: Lessons from four departments. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(6), 669-700. DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2005.11772304
Government of Canada. (2019). Work in Canada after You Graduate: About the Process. Retrieved from
The Graduate Assembly (2015). Graduate Student Happiness & Well-Being Report. Berkley, CA: University of California, Berkeley.
Hyun, J., Quinn, B., Madon, T., & Lustig, S. (2007). Mental health needs, awareness, and use of counselling services among international graduate students. Journal of American College Health, 56(2), 109-118.
Knight, J. (2002). Trade Talk: An analysis of the impact of trade liberalization and the general agreement on trade in services on higher education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 6(3), 209-229.
Lee, A. (2010). New Approaches to Doctoral Supervision: Implications for Educational Development. Educational Developments, 11, 12–23.
Lovitts, B. E. (2001). Leaving the ivory tower: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers: New York, NY.
NCPRE, (National Center for Professional and Research Ethics). (2018). Academic Unit Diagnostic Tool (AUDiT). Retrieved from
Orellana, M. L., Darder, A., Pérez, A., & Salinas, J. (2016). Improving doctoral success by matching PhD students with supervisors. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11, 87-103. Retrieved from
Paré, A., Starke-Meyerring, D., & McAlpine, L. (2011). Knowledge and identity work in the supervision of doctoral student writing: Shaping rhetorical subjects. In D. Starke-Meyerring, et al. (Eds.). Writing in knowledge societies. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press and WAC Clearinghouse (http://wac.colostate.edu/).
Pyhältö, K., Toom, A., Stubb, J., & Lonka, K. (2012). Challenges of becoming a scholar: A study of doctoral students’ problems and well-being. International Scholarly Research Network, Article ID 934941, 12 pages. DOI:10.5402/2012/934941
Qureshi, R., & Vazir, N. (2016). Pedagogy of research supervision pedagogy: a constructivist model. Research in Pedagogy, 6(2), 95‐110. DOI:10.17810/2015.38
Revelo, R., & Loui, M. (2016). A Developmental Model of Research Mentoring. College Teaching, 64(3), 119-129.
Rummler, G. A., & Brache, A. P. (1995). Improving Performance: How to Manage the White Space in the Organization Chart. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.
Sinclair, M. (2004). The Pedagogy of ‘Good’ PhD Supervision: A National Cross-Disciplinary Investigation of PhD Supervision. Australian Government, Department of Education, Science and Training. Retrieved from http://site.uit.no/epinor/files/2013/08/The-Pedagogy-of-Good-PhD-Supervision.pdf
Schwartz, M. (2016). Best practices in graduate supervision. Toronto, ON: Ryerson University. Retrieved from
Shannon, A. G. (1995). Research degree supervision: 'more mentor than master'. The Australian Universities' Review, 38(2), 12-15.
Starke-Meyerring, D. (2011). The paradox of writing in doctoral education: Student experiences. In L. McAlpine & C. Amundson. (Eds.). Supporting the doctoral process: Research-based strategies. New York: Springer.
Sverdlik, A. & Hall, N. C. (2019). Not just a phase: Exploring the role of program stage on well-being and motivation in doctoral students. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 25(2), 1–28.
Sverdlik, A., Hall, N. C., McAlpine, L., & Hubbard, K. (2018). The PhD Experience: A Review of the Factors Influencing Doctoral Students’ Completion, Achievement, and Well-Being. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13, 361-388.
Warrell, J., & Kawalilak, C. (2011). Proceedings from the 2011 Adult Education Research Conference: Transformative Learning is Not An Add-On – It is the Essence of Adult Education. Retrieved from http://newprairiepress.org/aerc/2011/papers/107
Winchester-Seeto, T., Homewood, J., Thogersen, J., Jacenyik-Trawoger, C., Manathunga, C., Reid, A., & Holbrook, A. (2014). Doctoral supervision in a cross-cultural context: issues affecting supervisors and candidates. Higher Education Research and Development, 33, 610-626.
Zhao, C-M., Golde, C. M., & McCormick, A. C. (2007). More than a signature: how advisor choice and advisor behaviour affect doctoral student satisfaction. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 31(3), 263-281. DOI: 10.1080/03098770701424983